LordSkippy

I'm still in a state of disbelief over the fact that within 24 hours there will be no more decoding necessary.

Hard to believe, but...this is the end of the thread as we know it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6vnoKxjNow

That is very rational thinking, but... under that logic, Diamondback is just a hypercoaster with more space between the seats. ...and it's not?

I don't like either of them, to be honest.

No. Then the forces would feel like an inverted coaster with slightly farther apart seats.

I thought Gatekeeper was great. It certainly warranted the destruction of Disaster Transport. Although I do like Wild Eagle a bit better.

To be fair, there is virtually no advantage to an inverted WingRider over a regular WingRider/Invert. It'd just end up being either an inverted coaster with more space between the two middle seats or a regular WingRider with an unnecessarily complicated support structure.

Posting a picture does not answer the question. If anything, I'm more confused as that looks like a dark ride to me. Anyway, I would bring back the Flying Eagles! And Tumble Bug. And Halley's Comet.

Oh, the irony.

I can't tell, as the attraction from which I would get my bearings (Delirium) is not visible. So I'm going to say maybe.

In defense of my earlier statement about Maverick... Before I had first ridden Maverick, everyone I had heard had said that Maverick was this amazing, unique, and incomparably wonderful ride close to on par with Millennium Force. The first time I rode it, it was alright, but I couldn't help bot experience some disappointment as the ride was most certainly not what it was hyped up to be. It just reminded me of an extended, uncomfortable version of Backlot Stunt Coaster. Since then, I've ridden it two more times and to be honest I have no desire to ride it ever again, partly due to the fact that it frequently has (from my experience) at least a fifteen minute wait during ERT. Thanks, but I'll pass. So yes. Maverick is a disappointing ride to me. Although Time Warp is certainly worse.

The fact that only one side of the station has loading gates basically debunks the Wing Coaster possibility yet again. That being said, I'm still pumped!

Oh boy. 1. The Beast 2. Diamondback 3. Vortex 4. Adventure Express 5. The Racer 6. Flight Deck 7. Flight of Fear Backlot, Firehawk, and Invertigo don't get rankings.

Just checked on Internet Explorer, and did see it. I thought I was falling for a prank or something. lol! What are we looking at? Can I see it on my iPhone? Never mind, it's not important.

Who? LordSkippy, who just couldn't resist.

I don't think Project 2014 has anything to do with the Social Security Administration.

Whew, thank goodness. I thought I really was going insane there for a minute.

Try closing out of your browser and opening it back up. I swear it's there. Maybe I really am losing it...

Don't feel stupid. http://www.KICentral.com/ Here you go.

One of the slides on the KIC homepage now shows a sepia version of "The Bat" webpage. Something tells me that wouldn't be up there unless it was intentionally meant to throw us off... Or maybe I'm just paranoid.

Cool! Sounds like a good alternative for those who can't be there in person.

Where does it refer to it. Can you provide something more that it has the abbreviation for an inverted coaster along with a bunch of random other numbers. And we don't know 100% that that track is for us(even though i think it is, with the matching numbers) If you looked at a single Diamondback support, you would have no idea what it would go to. We are all just presuming it is an invert. No, I cannot provide anything more. As far as I know, unless Kings Island/Cedar Fair/B&M/CSF is purposely trying to trick us by changing their ride type abbreviations, the blueprints point to an invert.

^ I have a feeling we won't be hearing from Intaminisnumber1 any time soon. He appears to have been banned.

If you're assuming the blueprints are 100% accurate (which, to be honest, they may not be) then you are also assuming it will be an invert due to the fact that the blueprint refers to it as such.

What does this even mean? I'm sure things are just good the way they'll be.