Okay well at least it looks like they're making strides with the new ride.

That's rmc topper track.

Send in the cranes

That's rmc topper track.

Does the rust give it more airtime?

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

http://www.rockymtnconstruction.com/topper-track.php

 

Why Beast Gal, why

Looks more like piles to me. Drive em deep so it doesn't fall over in soft soil. Google them.

I-beams. Most likely for building construction.

Actually, those beams aren't piles, as piles would have way more steel to allow for greater stability. It's the structure, and someone has ID that piece over Twitter to be almost identical to the Goliath structure at SFGA.

That's rmc topper track.

[emoji23]

That is definitely RMC topper track.

Trolllololollololol

Actually, those beams aren't piles, as piles would have way more steel to allow for greater stability. It's the structure, and someone has ID that piece over Twitter to be almost identical to the Goliath structure at SFGA.

That is what I meant.

That's rmc topper track.

[emoji23]

That is definitely RMC topper track.

Trolllololollololol

I do like how this post changed from not giving someone a hard time to this.

Actually, those beams aren't piles, as piles would have way more steel to allow for greater stability. It's the structure, and someone has ID that piece over Twitter to be almost identical to the Goliath structure at SFGA.

Piles are sized for the load they will carry. I highly doubt they will be cutting and welding those beams on site to build a station.

Most steel is going to come prefabbed for steel structures. There may be occasional field modded pieces but cutting those in the field does not make economical sense.

I'm calling piles or part of a retaining wall since they almost all appear to be the same length.

Actually, those beams aren't piles, as piles would have way more steel to allow for greater stability. It's the structure, and someone has ID that piece over Twitter to be almost identical to the Goliath structure at SFGA.

Goliath?

At Six Flags Great Adventure?

It had better NOT be.

***edited

Yeah, Mr. Glauser is wrong on this. The beams he sees in on Goliath are Channel beams or C-Beams. The ones sitting by WWC are I-beams and more than likely for pile driving and building a retaining wall during construction.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

And SFGA is NJFTP.

That place in Illinois is SFGAm.

Those are just i-beams. The ones on Goliath are "c" shaped. The beams could be for anything like the station or transfer shed frame. And the I-track that RMC uses is shaped like the Roman numerical of 2.

Photo taken here: https://twitter.com/GlauserDan13/status/750424492963422209

Sent from my LG-D851 using Tapatalk

Meanwhile, at NJFTP in 2017---OOOPS, off topic.

Never mind.

How does great adventure go to njftp?

New Jersey's Finest Theme Park -- NJFTP.

^ If you say so. I was told it was New Jersey's Filthiest Theme Park.

Incomming!!,

I don't see the reason to confuse people.

Exactly.

SFGA is not in Illinois.

SFGAm is in IL, SFGAdv is in NJ. That makes it easy to distinguish between the 2.

And SFGA is in NJ.

That's SIX's exact nomenclature for the park. They do NOT recognize nor use SFGAd.

And SFGA is in NJ.

That's SIX's exact nomenclature for the park. They do NOT recognize nor use SFGAd.

So do they use SFGAm for the IL park and SFGA for the NJ park?

^^ How about NJFTP?

And SFGA is in NJ.

That's SIX's exact nomenclature for the park. They do NOT recognize nor use SFGAd.

So do they use SFGAm for the IL park and SFGA for the NJ park?

Yep.

And they know just exactly who uses NJFTP.

And that's good enough for me.

I wonder if they already have a name picked out and if so is that something they copy right?

They've probably had a named picked out before the funnel cake stand bit the dust. 

I wonder if they already have a name picked out and if so is that something they copy right?

You mean trademark....